← back

Inside the Unfair Judge: A Mechanistic Interpretability Account of LLM-as-Judge

Existing studies of LLM-as-judge scoring bias work predominantly at the input-output level: they perturb inputs, measure score deltas, and propose prompt-level mitigations. We argue that the same biases admit a representation-level account

https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.11871v1 ↗
Thesis fit
Good fit

Within your typical scope; diligence still required.

Edit thesis
In your usual scope
Idea match None

How close the company’s idea is to your thesis statement

Sector llm, ai

Overlap with sectors you care about

Geography Unknown

Location unknown — scores 0

Your thesis: “We back exceptional technical founders building AI-first products and infrastructure, deploying $100K checks within 24 hours.”

Founder → stable Traction → stable Idea vs market ↓ declining
Generate memo
Add / edit details

Correct facts used on the next screening or memo.

Similar baseline plays (YC · idea space)

Datacurve · Active
Frontier coding data for training and evaluating LLMs
founders not scraped yet
Vesence · Active
Cursor for Lawyers. Agentic AI in MS Office.
founders not scraped yet
SAMMY Labs · Active
Computational Law
founders not scraped yet
Legora · Active
The AI workspace for lawyers
founders not scraped yet
Lexter.ai · Active
LLM for Legal in Brazil
founders not scraped yet