Does Multi-Agent Debate Improve AI Feedback on Research Papers?
Probably not, at least for meta-analyses in economics. In a pre-registered, identity-masked, within-paper experiment, the authors of 44 meta-analyses ranked three AI reports on their own paper by usefulness for improving it: a single pass b
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14713v1 ↗Thesis fit
Good fit
Within your typical scope; diligence still required.
In your usual scope
Idea match
Light
How close the company’s idea is to your thesis statement
Sector
ai
Overlap with sectors you care about
Geography
Unknown
Location unknown — scores 0
Your thesis: “We back exceptional technical founders building AI-first products and infrastructure, deploying $100K checks within 24 hours.”
Founder → stable
Traction → stable
Idea vs market → stable
▸ Add / edit details
Correct facts used on the next screening or memo.
Activity & evidence
Similar baseline plays (YC · idea space)
unSurvey
· Acquired
AI-led market research interviews, no scheduling, instant insights.
Abel Riboulot
Andrej Zukov-Gregoric
RefineTrain AI
· Active
AI agents rewriting & optimising your internal documentation for LLMs
founders not scraped yet
Cohesion
· Active
Agents that automate research for institutional investors
founders not scraped yet