Rethinking Penetration Testing for AI-Enabled Systems: From Resource Compromise
Penetration testing traditionally evaluates whether adversaries can exploit weaknesses in software, infrastructure, configurations, or operational controls to achieve security-relevant compromise. This paradigm remains necessary for AI-enab
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14006v1 ↗Thesis fit
Good fit
Within your typical scope; diligence still required.
In your usual scope
Idea match
Light
How close the company’s idea is to your thesis statement
Sector
ai
Overlap with sectors you care about
Geography
Unknown
Location unknown — scores 0
Your thesis: “We back exceptional technical founders building AI-first products and infrastructure, deploying $100K checks within 24 hours.”
Founder → stable
Traction → stable
Idea vs market ↓ declining
▸ Add / edit details
Correct facts used on the next screening or memo.
People
M
Mohammad Allahbakhsh
1.0
low confidence
M
Mohammad Hassan Bahari
1.0
low confidence
M
Moslem Attar-Raouf
1.0
low confidence
Activity & evidence
Similar baseline plays (YC · idea space)
Casco
· Active
Autonomous security testing for web apps, APIs, cloud, and AI systems
founders not scraped yet
Veria Labs
· Active
Continuous AI pentesting that finds and fixes vulnerabilities
founders not scraped yet
Alter
· Active
Secure access control and authorization platform for agent workflows
founders not scraped yet