← back

ToolAlignBench: Investigating Alignment Conflicts in Tool-Calling Enabled LLMs

Safety alignment in LLMs aims to align models with human values, but which values take precedence when they conflict? We investigate this question in the context of tool-calling LLM agents deployed in regulated industries, where agents proc

https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.14285v1 ↗
Thesis fit
Good fit

Within your typical scope; diligence still required.

Edit thesis
In your usual scope
Idea match None

How close the company’s idea is to your thesis statement

Sector agents, llm, ai

Overlap with sectors you care about

Geography Outside

Outside your target regions — scores 0

Your thesis: “We back exceptional technical founders building AI-first products and infrastructure, deploying $100K checks within 24 hours.”

Founder → stable Traction → stable Idea vs market → stable
Generate memo
Add / edit details

Correct facts used on the next screening or memo.

Similar baseline plays (YC · idea space)

OpenTools · Active
The API for LLM tool use
founders not scraped yet
SafetyKit · Active
AI agents for risk, compliance, and safety
founders not scraped yet
PromptArmor · Active
LLM Security and Compliance
founders not scraped yet
Ashr · Active
Automated Multi-Modal Testing for Agents
Helicone · Acquired
LLM Observability for Developers
founders not scraped yet